step 3. Abilities
Dining table step one portrays brand new frequency of any of your dangers of the analysis, according to the amount of severity discover. Concurrently, they suggests brand new evaluations involving the distributions from girls and boys on the additional threats. Full, the participants which exhibited no problem ranged ranging from % that has no problems having difficult Websites use and up to help you 83.4% who’d no troubles having on the web brushing. We remember that the variety of moderate and you will serious issues varied between 4% to have sexting and you can 17% to possess difficult Sites play with. 9% of moderate/serious issues along with cyberbullying, it reached 13.7%. The fresh new wavelengths based in the other quantities of dilemmas have been constantly deeper for girls than for boys.
Desk step one
Prevalence of any of one’s threats as the a purpose of new seriousness of state on the overall attempt as well as intercourse.
In this regard, significant differences were also found between boys and girls in the mean total scores fetlife kullanıcı adı of cyberbullying victimization (Welch’s t = ?2.02, p < 0.043, d = 0.07), online grooming (Welch's t = ?3.51, p < 0.001, d = 0.12) and problematic Internet use (Welch's t = ?2.07, p < 0.039, d = 0.07). In these cases, the mean scores were higher for girls than for boys. There were no significant differences in the rest of the risks: cyber dating abuse victimization (Welch's t = ?1.9, p < 0.058, d = 0.12) and sexting (Welch's t = 0.94, p < 0.410, d = 0.03).
Regarding the type of school (private and public), significant differences were only found in the risks of online grooming (t = ?3.37, p < 0.001, d = 0.13) and sexting (t = 3.8, p < 0.001, d = 0.15). The mean scores were higher in public schools than in private schools in both cases.
In terms of the educational stage (1st–2nd grade of CSE, 3rd–4th grade of CSE and Post-secondary Education), statistically significant differences were found for the risks of cyberbullying victimization (p < 0.002), online grooming (p < 0.001), sexting (p < 0.001) and problematic Internet use (p < 0.001). The scores were higher in 3rd–4th grades, except for online grooming victimization, where higher scores were found in Post-secondary Education (see Table dos ).
Table 2
Variations because a purpose of academic stage (1st–second, 3rd–fourth levels off CSE and you can Post-secondary Education) regarding the threats (letter = 3212, apart from happening away from cyber dating punishment which have letter = 1061).
Note: M = arithmetic mean; SD = practical deviation, F = Welch’s-F, p = significance; ? 2 = eta squared.
Desk 3 reveals the brand new correlations within individuals risks. Them got self-confident and you will tall correlations together, with the relationship between cyberbullying victimization and you will cyber dating victimization updates aside. Sites dangers which have an intimate component (on line grooming and you will sexting) was in fact highly correlated. Generally speaking, the fresh new correlations were higher getting males for the majority of one’s threats, apart from this new dating anywhere between cyber relationships victimization and you may brushing and you may ranging from problematic Websites use and you can cyberbullying victimization, on line brushing and you may sexting.
Desk step 3
Note: The correlations for boys are shown below the diagonal and for girls above it. All correlations are significant at p < 0.001. M = arithmetic mean; SD = standard deviation.
Dining table 4 merchandise the fresh comorbidities among the many various Sites dangers related so you’re able to personal interaction (cyberbullying victimization, cyber dating abuse victimization, sexting an internet-based brushing). Precisely the people which completed all the items concerning threats associated to victimization (letter = 1109) had been considered (we.elizabeth., eliminating on analysis those who had no companion). Of the leftover users, sixty.7% showed one or more of the analysed dangers (n = 674). The risk towards the highest private frequency was cyberbullying victimization (%), accompanied by on line grooming. The most prevalent a couple-exposure combinations was indeed cyberbullying victimization-on line grooming and you can cyberbullying-sexting. I focus on the 3-chance blend of cyberbullying-sexting-brushing victimization. Fundamentally, 5.49% of the victimized teens exhibited the dangers conjointly.